Mini Review: Australia and New Zealand, So Close Yet So Far: A Mini Review of Educational and Professional Standards in Medical Laboratory Science
Sangeeta Kanwar, Indu Singh, Roselyn Rose’Meyer
Abstract
Medical scientists have a crucial role in diagnostic medicine but are undervalued as a profession. These practitioners must understand clinical laboratory tests and procedures and remain abreast of advancing technologies, emerging commercial analytical instruments and newly developed diagnostic testing kits. Globally all medical scientists require the same standard of training and professional performance.
Every country has professional and educational standards which are often aligned with the international standards and requirements for the quality and competence of medical laboratories (ISO15189 standards). Despite similarities in standards and increased global mobility of workforces, lack of formal recognition of medical scientists across the world has caused a shortage of competent and skilled laboratory professionals, who are restricted in their ability to move to other countries for work. This paper compares two very close countries which recognize and share many resources and professional standards. However, the oversight of medical laboratory science programs and staff varies significantly. One important factor is the lack of national registration for practicing medical scientists. Both countries have very high professional standards and high quality of patient care, but only New Zealand has both institutional and individual professional accountability while in Australia, medical scientists are not held responsible by the Australian Health Professional Regulation Agency (AHPRA).
Keywords: Medical science, professional regulatory standards, educational standards, New Zealand, Australia
Int. J. Bio. Lab. Sci 2026(15)1:86-92 【PDF】

